I listened to Dan Patrick for about 10 minutes on the way home today. You know, he’s a local conservativetalk show host, radio station owner and Texas Senator. He started off stating that he’s not going to just take conservative or Republican stands, and then turns right around and follows the standard line from McCain that Obama insulted the troops by stating that it has been more than the surge that has contributed to the reduction in violence in Iraq.
Of course, in making that point, Patrick ignores the self imposed ceasefire of the southern Iraqi Shiites, the piles of U.S. money and weapons given to the Sunis in Anbar, the mass emigration of millions of Iraqis and the partitioning of Iraqi cities into ethnic neighborhoods.
Oh, and I wonder if Patrick is worried about insulting this guy, the so-called “father of the surge.” (That last link is to the front page and the info there will probably change, but for now it calls Fred Kagan that.)
Also, given that Patrick hasn’t really been a part of the military and might need some insight on the views of those currently and recently serving, you know, in Iraq and Afghanistan, he might want to read what they have to say. (That’s an arm of VoteVets.) I mean, despite the effort of the current administration, the military isn’t all conservative/Republicans.
Back to Patrick. In that five minutes, he also called Obama arrogant because he believes his vision to be correct. Then Patrick goes on to say that he feels the same way about his vision, lots of people do. But Obama is arrogant.
It’s not the first time that Patrick has said stuff like this. I’ve found him just as happy to make stuff up as any wingnut talk show host. Oh!!! That reminds me. I didn’t have time to look it up on Lexis/Nexis today, but I will tomorrow. Bill Bennett this morning said that when he was drug czar (how many times does he say that in a 3 hour show? About a hundred times) he was invited to Alaska by a bunch of pot smoking Libertarians to debate pot smoking and 10,000 of them showed up — just three days late! Dumbass pot smokers! For some reason (past fibbing?) I just don’t believe the guy. But I will look it up.
Next, my very most favorite wingnut, Kathleen. You know, she’s the homemaker/blogger with a crush on John McCain and an unhealthy/distorted viewpoint on black people. Today she got a little confused and in a way showed her ass.
From her post at the Chron today:
I also noted, as did others, that the volunteer greets in Afghanistan for Obama seemed to lack “diversity.” Most of the faces were black. Why was that? I found it curious. After those initial meetings I suppose someone in the campaign noticed this and Obama started meeting with unit formations. Because it is all about the presentation here folks.
(As a side note, McCain is at a townhall in NH — the backdrop is pretty pale, but no matter.)
She had up another post from yesterday:
There is this politican. He is black, charasmatic, and intelligent. Now that may sound like Obama, but this guy happens to be right on all the issues, instead of wrong like Obama.
Unfortunately, Kathleen gets a bit confused in the comments of her post from yesterday, thinking someone was questioning her about today’s pronouncement:
What does his skin color have to do with anything?
*note: Nothing at all unless they are changing photo ops to require diversity. The thing about it is that I don’t believe that Obama needs to do that. But obviously his campaign does.TexasSparkle
A little later:
*note: Nothing at all unless they are changing photo ops to require diversity. The thing about it is that I don’t believe that Obama needs to do that. But obviously his campaign does.TexasSparkle
So why mention he’s black if color doesn’t mean anything. You could have left the description at “charasmatic, and intelligent”. It’s obviously that your party of choice needs diversity, otherwise you wouldn’t have mentioned skin color in your description. Sounds like you’re contradictig yourself.
*note: oops, sorry! I was referring to the wrong post. When I check these comments it doesn’t show which post they are on. I thought you were referring to Obama and his photo ops in the Middle East. Ok, I use the term “black” because I was comparing Williams to Obama. In case you didn’t notice, Obama is black and people think that is kind of an historical thing. Oh, and our party DOES need diversity–TexasSparkle
“People thinkthat is kind of an historical thing.” It’s all in your mind, people. I mean, srly, McCain is an historical thing, too, no?